Biodiversity Value of Residential Areas
Impacts of Residential Development and Amelioration of Biodiversity Impacts

Download the Report

he purpose of this study was to demonstrate the value of urban areas to protecting biodiversity. A common misconception is that urban areas and biodiversity are mutually exclusive. The scope of this paper was to identify what types of animals make use of residential areas and the attributes that promote or discourage their survival. Twenty-seven diverse residential sites in six different counties of the greater Chicago region were selected to evaluate the features valuable to wildlife. A mix of older and newer developments, some actively promoting the environment, was chosen as part of the study. Residential housing densities ranged from 0.2 to 13.6 units per acre, and sites near Illinois Nature Preserves were favored to increase the likelihood of observing animals.

The results of the study found that particular species of birds and mammals are able to survive, and some to even thrive, within residential areas. Field work and interviews identified 38 bird species, 35 of which were native, within the study areas. A significant number of native mammals also were sighted. Amphibians and reptiles did not fare as well in residential areas and were only reported in ponds and retention basins. Insects were found to have moderate levels of diversity. Regarding plant life, 13 of the 27 sites had large oak trees that appeared to be native. The results indicate that except for trees, native vegetation is much less likely to survive in residential areas over one unit per acre.

Overall, the study finds that ponds, streams, and other natural or naturalized water features are likely to increase the biodiversity in an area and that many new developments, such as Prairie Crossing, have included such features. Older residential areas tend to accumulate more woody debris and have larger shrubs and trees than newer developments, which also proves significant in promoting biodiversity. This is apparently especially relevant to native mammals. The diversity of birds is most directly related to the presence of wetlands and a diversity of native vegetation. Reptiles, amphibians and invertebrates are most dependent on the presence of wetlands.
These findings are significant in that they create the awareness that urban areas are vital to the promotion of biodiversity, and that local ordinances can encourage or discourage the prevalence of native vegetation and open water features important to improved diversity. Developers can actively plan and build in a way that enhances biodiversity by including these features, while increased biodiversity in older residential areas indicates the need to preserve these areas and maintain the characteristics attractive to wildlife. Several new subdivisions studied, including Prairie Crossing, Mill Creek, Hybernia and the Sanctuary, increased the overall level of biodiversity by incorporating open water into the development. In fact, the improved biodiversity of these developments was used for marketing purposes. Overall, knowledge of the features that preserve biodiversity in residential areas, combined with adequate local regulations to preserve them, allows for those species most suited to residential areas to reach optimal levels.

 

© Copyright 2004, Northeastern Illinois Planning Commission